Radio ABC International – Today Show – Future Tech Segment

Morris Misel

Business Futurist | Foresight Strategist

If you’ve read this far, something probably connected.

Maybe it put words to something you’d been sensing but couldn’t quite land. Maybe it made something complicated feel clearer. Maybe it unsettled a position you thought you’d settled.

Good. That’s where this work lives.

Not forecasting. Not scenarios at 2050. Not more noise. What’s already moving. The shifts most organisations can’t yet see, name, or understand the full weight of. What it means. What to do about it while it’s still a possibility, not a problem. Short term and long.

Morris Misel has been doing this for 30 years across 160 industries, with boards, executive teams, and leadership groups in Australia and internationally. More than 2,800 engagements. Over a million people a year through conferences, boardrooms, and media.

If you want more of this thinking while it’s still a signal, not a headline, subscribe to Immediate Futures.

If you want ongoing access to everything I do for clients, packaged for you, with direct access to me, join the Signal Room.

If you’re considering bringing this work into your conference, boardroom, or organisation, enquire here.

Choose Forward.

How does a foresight strategist approach explaining future technology to a mainstream media audience?

The challenge is translating emerging signals into language that connects with how people actually live and work. A foresight strategist focuses less on the technology itself and more on the human choices it creates: what becomes possible, what becomes expected, and what disappears. That framing makes abstract futures feel immediate and relevant.

What kinds of technology trends tend to surface in a future tech media segment, and why do they matter now?

The trends worth discussing in a media context are rarely the newest. They are the ones already reshaping everyday decisions. Automation, connectivity, personalisation, and surveillance are persistent themes because they sit at the intersection of technology and human behaviour. They matter now because organisations and individuals are already making choices inside them, often without realising it.

What is the most common misunderstanding when media coverage focuses on future technology?

The biggest mistake is framing technology as something that happens to people rather than something people navigate and choose. Technology creates conditions; it does not determine outcomes. When media focuses only on the capability, what the technology can do, it misses the more important question: what kind of future are we choosing by adopting it?

How does discussing future technology on national radio connect to broader shifts in organisational strategy?

Media conversations about technology tend to reach leaders at the moment they are deciding whether something is relevant to them. A well-framed segment can accelerate that recognition, helping organisations move from watching this to needing to prepare now. Public conversation shapes the permission environment that organisations operate inside.

What should organisations be watching in the period immediately following any major technology forecast discussion?

The signals that matter most come from adjacent industries and early adopters rather than from the technology itself. Watch what changes in customer expectation, workforce behaviour, and regulatory attention. Those ripple effects move faster than the technology cycle and give organisations more time to respond if they are paying attention early enough.

Leave a comment